<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recycled Toilet Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/</link>
	<description>An exploration of urban sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pragmatic Environmentalism</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Pragmatic Environmentalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 04:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/?p=77#comment-714</guid>
		<description>[...] One year ago: Recycled Toilet Paper. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One year ago: Recycled Toilet Paper. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Green Links &#8211; 2/12 &#171; Pragmatic Environmentalism</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Green Links &#8211; 2/12 &#171; Pragmatic Environmentalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/?p=77#comment-248</guid>
		<description>[...] to me a while back, but I haven&#8217;t been able to find it yet. I&#8217;m pretty happy with my Green Forest for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to me a while back, but I haven&#8217;t been able to find it yet. I&#8217;m pretty happy with my Green Forest for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Back at 2009 &#171; Pragmatic Environmentalism</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Back at 2009 &#171; Pragmatic Environmentalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/?p=77#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] Recycled toilet paper &#8211; If we see the Marcal brand that Alli recommended we&#8217;ll try it, but otherwise, we&#8217;re perfectly happy with Green Forest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recycled toilet paper &#8211; If we see the Marcal brand that Alli recommended we&#8217;ll try it, but otherwise, we&#8217;re perfectly happy with Green Forest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Pike</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/?p=77#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that I&#039;ve ever seen Natural Value. Where do you find it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;ve ever seen Natural Value. Where do you find it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie M</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/2009/08/13/recycled-toilet-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticenvironmentalism.com/?p=77#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I also like Green Forest, but I prefer double (and triple) rolls.  Now I get Natural Value (only 80% post-consumer content).  CVS was the worst!!  Sensitive bottoms will not like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like Green Forest, but I prefer double (and triple) rolls.  Now I get Natural Value (only 80% post-consumer content).  CVS was the worst!!  Sensitive bottoms will not like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

