Pragmatic Environmentalism

An exploration of urban sustainability.

Friday Green Links – 2/26 February 26, 2010

Filed under: links — Brenda Pike @ 9:14 pm
Tags:

So the links this week are a little heavy on the makeup, because that’s what’s on my mind. I promise to be all butch again next week. On to the links:

That’s all for this week. As usual, if you see anything interesting, send it my way.

 

Looking for Green Makeup February 24, 2010

I’ve never been a girly girl, but I decided I couldn’t hit 30 without even knowing how to wear makeup. So this week I made an appointment for a consultation at Sephora. I chose Sephora not just because they’re across the street from where I work; they also have a “natural” label for some makeup lines.

Now, natural can mean a lot of different things—or nothing. In this case, Sephora defines it as ”formulated to exclude a minimum of six of these eight ingredients”:

  • GMOs (genetically modified organisms) – I really have nothing against GMOs. Humans have practiced animal husbandry for hundreds of years, and I think this is just another step further.
  • Parabens – These are endocrine disruptors, linked to breast cancer and reproductive problems.
  • Petrochemicals – Used in lip gloss and such. I try to decrease oil in the rest of my life; why not cosmetics, too?
  • Phthalates – These are also endocrine disruptors, like the BPA behind the whole plastic scare last year.
  • Sulfates – Mostly used in shampoos. Can potentially irritate skin.
  • Synthetic fragrances – Potentially can cause allergic reactions. But if you (like me) don’t usually have allergies to scents, I don’t see much of a problem with them.
  • Synthetic dyes –  Potentially made of toxic chemicals, like dioxins, and heavy metals. I’ve never really considered this before, and I’ll have to think about it more.
  • Triclosan – An antibacterial chemical usually found in soaps. Helps create antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Potentially leads to liver and thyroid problems.

Brenda post-makeup doesn't actually look all that different than Brenda pre-makeup.

I’ve started with the bareMinerals line, which includes a foundation, bronzer, mineral veil, and lip gloss. The good thing about powders like these is that they aren’t absorbed into the skin as much as liquid makeup, and the worst thing they contain is the sunscreen zinc oxide. The sun is probably worse for me than that. However, I also got Fresh chapstick (excuse me, lip treatment), which includes oxybenzone, and Blinc mascara, which does contain parabens. I feel bad about that, but since it’s my first time trying mascara, I want something won’t irritate my contacts. Maybe I’ll graduate to something better for me later on.

The most important thing (for me) is that none of these products have been tested on animals. Animal welfare was what started my environmental path years ago, and it’s still one of my top priorities.

By the way, many people recommend the Environmental Working Group’s cosmetic safety database, but I’ve never found their product search very useful. It’s fine for looking up more information on particular chemicals, but in their ratings they give as much weight to perfumes that might cause an allergic reaction as to chemicals that might cause cancer. That brings down ratings and terrifies people about perfectly harmless products.

I know there’s probably makeup out there that’s more “natural” than what I’ve chosen, but I really needed the tutorial. And it was actually helpful! Afterward, putting on makeup in the morning was relatively easy, if a little more time-consuming than my normal morning ritual. I’m sure I’ll reduce it even further after I’ve played around for a few weeks, but for now I feel a little bit like I’m in middle school again.

So what do you think of my choices so far? What do you wear?

 

Greenwashing – Car Washing, That Is February 22, 2010

We finally washed our car this weekend. After three trips to Maine in a month, it really needed it. I’m happy to report that, much like with dishes, the most environmentally friendly way to wash is also the laziest.

That’s right—a commercial car washing facility is the best way to wash a car. Why?

  • Less water use – Washing a car by hand at home uses between 80 and 140 gallons of water; automatic car washes average just 45 gallons. They do this by mixing air with the water to get a high pressure spray, as well as reusing filtered waste water.
  • Better waste water disposal – Driveway car washing allows the waste water to flow directly into storm drains, where it contaminates waterways. Commercial car washes by law must filter their waste water before directing it into the sewer system.

It looks like the absolute best solution is actually to wash a car by hand at a commercial facility, which uses the least water (around 15 gallons) and prevents pollution from washing into storm drains. That’s awfully cold this time of year, though, so we’ll compromise by using a drive-through car wash until it warms up.

 

Friday Green Links – 2/19 February 19, 2010

Filed under: links — Brenda Pike @ 9:59 pm
Tags: ,

Some interesting local news this week. Do you want the good news or the bad news first?

Elsewhere, my How to Clean Up a Broken Thermometer post was featured in the Carnival of the Green over at Eco Street. As always, if you see anything you think I might be interested in, send it my way.